CRIT CLOUD

  • Summaries & Reviews
    • Airway
    • Cardiovascular
    • Controversies
    • Endocrinology
    • Fluids
    • Guidelines
    • Infections
    • Neurology
    • Nutrition
    • Pharmacology
    • Procedures
    • Radiology
    • Renal
    • Resuscitiation
    • Respiratory
    • Sedation
    • Sepsis
    • Transfusion
  • World of Foam
  • FOAM.education
  • Education
    • ACLS Training ICU Lindenhofspital
    • Download Presentations
    • Download CME Galway Clinic 🔒
    • Download CME Lindenhof Hospital 🔒
    • Echo 🔒
    • Presentations🔒
    • Multimedia
  • About Us
    • Contact
  • Summaries & Reviews
    • Airway
    • Cardiovascular
    • Controversies
    • Endocrinology
    • Fluids
    • Guidelines
    • Infections
    • Neurology
    • Nutrition
    • Pharmacology
    • Procedures
    • Radiology
    • Renal
    • Resuscitiation
    • Respiratory
    • Sedation
    • Sepsis
    • Transfusion
  • World of Foam
  • FOAM.education
  • Education
    • ACLS Training ICU Lindenhofspital
    • Download Presentations
    • Download CME Galway Clinic 🔒
    • Download CME Lindenhof Hospital 🔒
    • Echo 🔒
    • Presentations🔒
    • Multimedia
  • About Us
    • Contact

FOAM Bits

Metamizole - And Why You Should Not Fear this Drug!

26/1/2021

0 Comments

 
Picture
Headlines in the thelocal.es

Many rumours are going around about Metamizole; most of them are full of fear of potential side effects. Some countries like Ireland and GB have banned this drug due to the rare side effect of agranulocytosis. A fact is too that many other countries like Switzerland continue to use Metamizole on a regular basis and find low incidence rates of 0.46-1.63 cases per million person-days of use (2006-2012).

Regarding serious side effects associated with other analgesics used (e.g. acute liver failure with Paracetamol, renal failure with NSAID) it is difficult to understand why Metamizole needs to be banned when the others are available over the counter.

Get all the information AND literature you need to be prepared and discuss here:

https://icurevisited.com/dipyrone-metamizole/
​
0 Comments

Yes, it is Safe to Drain More than 1500ml of Pleural Effusion!

14/8/2019

0 Comments

 
Picture

​Most Swiss Guidelines recommend never to drain more than 1500ml of pleural fluid when performing a thoracocentesis. The reason is that excessive drainage might cause re-expansion pleural effusion (e.g. www.medstandards.ch). There is not much literature on the safe amount of fluid one can drain, but a clinical practice article on pleural effusions in the New England Journal of Medicine also states that "...in which case therapeutic thoracentesis to remove up to 1500 ml of fluid is indicated." (N Engl J Med 2002; 346:1971-1977).
​
Interestingly there is no evidence supporting this recommendation. Some data suggests that the risk of re-expansion pulmonary oedema might correlate with the baseline size of the effusion, rather than the volume of fluid removed.​

However, the first results from research start giving us some answers and indicate that removing more than 1500ml of fluids is safe and feasible.


Ault M et al. (Thorax. 2015;70(2):127-132.) looked at 9320 patients during 11 years who underwent thoracocentesis and recorded the incidence of adverse events. They were able to show that:

  • The occurrence of re-expansion pulmonary oedema is rare, also when large amounts of fluids are drained
 
  • No patient died due to this intervention


Lentz RJ et al. (Lancet Respir Med. 2019;7(5):447-455.) showed that

  • The use of manometry during thoracocentesis does not influence patient outcome.


All the details and lots of background information are very nicely summarized in this fabulous post on emcrit.org:

PulmCrit - Large volume thora: Can we drain 'em dry?

0 Comments

The Lactate Pathway Explained by Cliff Reid

28/1/2019

0 Comments

 
Reference
1. Reid C, Rees V, Collyer-Merritt H. Non-septic hyperlactataemia in the emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2010 May;27(5):411–2
0 Comments

Get an Overview on All Relevant Trial of 2016 - Summarized by Critical Care Reviews

1/2/2017

0 Comments

 
Picture
"The Critical Care Reviews Book summarises, critiques and puts in context the biggest trials of the year." There is not much more to add. Rob Mac Sweeney and four other intensivists of Northern Ireland try to make the impossible - possible. On 344 pages they have summarised a selection of the maybe most relevant trials concerning critical care of 2016. In regards of all the countless trials published every year this is a fantastic piece of work. Supporting the idea of Free Open Access Meducation this book is free for download and a must for any clinician involved in critial care.

Great job lads!


The free download is available HERE

0 Comments

Penicillin Anaphylaxis - or why we should fear bedsheets more than meropenem!

28/10/2016

0 Comments

 
Picture
This excellent post by Josh Farkas from Emcrit.org resumes nicely on how our daily work sometimes is influenced by fears and not knowledge. If you are worried to give a patient meropenem after he had an anaphylactic reaction to penicillin in the past... then this  reading is for you!



His Bottom Line comes as follows:
  • Meropenem doesn’t cause anaphylaxis.
  • Meropenem probably isn’t cross-allergic with penicillin, due to structural differences in its side chains and beta-lactam core.
  • It is widely quoted that patients with penicillin allergy have a ~1% risk of reaction to meropenem. This information is based on non-validated skin testing to meropenem, which is probably incorrect.
  • Prospective studies have proven the safety of giving meropenem to patients with a history of anaphylaxis to penicillin.

Don't miss out this excellent post: PulmCrit mythbusting - Anaphylaxis to penicillins isn’t a contraindication to meropenem

0 Comments

Central Lines... Getting Rid of Old Fears!

13/8/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
Doctors get thought many things that must be done in one sort of way and we do many things because we were thought so! Sometimes it is important though to  question standard procedures especially as our knowledge grows rapidly over time.


It's only a couple of years ago many anaesthetists were thought to insert central lines 'blindly' by using anatomical landmarks. X-rays confirmed line placement, ideally in the lower part of the superior vena cava, and excluded complications like a pneumothorax. Line placement in the right atrium was said to cause cardiac perforation and accidental placement in the contralateral subclavian vein often led to re-insertions of new lines. But important questions remains: Is this all really true? What actually do we know?


PulmCrit.org looked into this issue and just posted an excellent little review. Their bottom line is:

  • The ideal placement of the central line tip is unknown. 
  • Placement of central lines within the right atrium appears safe, and is specifically recommended by some guidelines for hemodialysis catheters.
  • Central lines terminating in the brachiocephalic trunk or subclavian vein are probably fine to use for most critical care applications (other than, for example, measurement of central venous pressure or mixed venous oxygen saturation). 
  • A combination of lung ultrasonography, internal jugular vein ultrasonography, and cardiac ultrasonography with a microbubble injection usually allows immediate exclusion of pneumothorax and proof that the catheter is in a intrathoracic vein.  Ultrasonography may be superior to chest X-ray for confirmation of line placement. 

Read their post here

0 Comments

Reminder: Levels of Evidence

7/5/2015

0 Comments

 
Picture
0 Comments

    Search

    Translate

    Select your language above. Beware: Google Translate is often imprecise and might result in incorrect phrases!


    ​Categories

    All
    Airway
    Antibiotics
    Cardiology
    Education
    Evidence Based Medicine
    Procedures
    Q And A
    Sonography

    Archives

    January 2021
    March 2020
    August 2019
    January 2019
    June 2018
    February 2017
    October 2016
    February 2016
    August 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015

    Author

    Collecting FOAM pearls and sharing them in the World of FOAM.

    Welcome to the site where posts on the net are the author themselves!

    RSS Feed

ABOUT US

The Crit ☁​ supports free access medical education. The content of this website can be used and reproduced by stating a reference to our site.
Read our statements here

SEARCH US

CONTACT US

If you have any interesting article or news to be posted on this website, please contact us here
​

FOLLOW US

TRUST US

TWEET US

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.

Picture
Follow @BIJCorg

DISCOVER THE WORLD OF #FOAMed HERE
Picture